Page generated: 09 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC
← Dashboard

CVE-2026-33634

Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in `aquasecurity/trivy-action` to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in `aquasecurity/setup-…

Read full description
Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in `aquasecurity/trivy-action` to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in `aquasecurity/setup-trivy` with malicious commits. This incident is a continuation of the supply chain attack that began in late February 2026. Following the initial disclosure on March 1, credential rotation was performed but was not atomic (not all credentials were revoked simultaneously). The attacker could have use a valid token to exfiltrate newly rotated secrets during the rotation window (which lasted a few days). This could have allowed the attacker to retain access and execute the March 19 attack. Affected components include the `aquasecurity/trivy` Go / Container image version 0.69.4, the `aquasecurity/trivy-action` GitHub Action versions 0.0.1 – 0.34.2 (76/77), and the`aquasecurity/setup-trivy` GitHub Action versions 0.2.0 – 0.2.6, prior to the recreation of 0.2.6 with a safe commit. Known safe versions include versions 0.69.2 and 0.69.3 of the Trivy binary, version 0.35.0 of trivy-action, and version 0.2.6 of setup-trivy. Additionally, take other mitigations to ensure the safety of secrets. If there is any possibility that a compromised version ran in one's environment, all secrets accessible to affected pipelines must be treated as exposed and rotated immediately. Check whether one's organization pulled or executed Trivy v0.69.4 from any source. Remove any affected artifacts immediately. Review all workflows using `aquasecurity/trivy-action` or `aquasecurity/setup-trivy`. Those who referenced a version tag rather than a full commit SHA should check workflow run logs from March 19–20, 2026 for signs of compromise. Look for repositories named `tpcp-docs` in one's GitHub organization. The presence of such a repository may indicate that the fallback exfiltration mechanism was triggered and secrets were successfully stolen. Pin GitHub Actions to full, immutable commit SHA hashes, don't use mutable version tags.
CVSS 9.4 (CRITICAL) KEV: KNOWN CATALOG

Attention and evidence

HYPE SCORE
0.0/10
REALITY · THREAT PRIORITY
8.7/10
General review priority; not probability

Evidence confidence: Exploitation recorded

Why this priority?
  • Recorded exploitation baseline: +7.00
  • Technical severity: CVSS 9.4: +1.41
  • Fresh EPSS: 59.73%: +0.30

General review priority, not probability, victim count or asset-specific risk. A range covers missing CVSS/EPSS inputs within the current evidence state.

Sources: 11 documents and public datasets.

Hype components

Headline sample (25%)
0/100
Press, 30 days (60%)
0/100
Grounded branding (15%)
0/100
HYPE TOTAL0/100

Sources and documents

Cybernews
Press · 13 Aug 2026, 07:00 · Gargantuan trove of stolen secrets surfaces from LiteLLM supply chain attack - Cybernews
Techzine Global
Press · 18 May 2026, 07:00 · TeamPCP compromises Python libraries via supply chain attack - Techzine Global
Techzine Global
Press · 11 May 2026, 07:00 · Checkmarx Jenkins plugin compromised in new supply chain attack - Techzine Global
Halcyon Anti-Ransomware Platform
Press · 17 Apr 2026, 07:00 · Trivy Supply Chain Compromise Enters Extortion Phase as Vect Ransomware Publishes First Victim - Halcyon Anti-Ransomware Platform
Recorded Future
Press · 13 Apr 2026, 07:00 · March 2026 CVE Landscape: 31 High-Impact Vulnerabilities Identified, Interlock Ransomware Group Exploits Cisco FMC Zero-Day - Recorded Future
See all 11 source documents
Snyk
Press · 31 Mar 2026, 14:38 · How a Poisoned Security Scanner Became the Key to Backdooring LiteLLM - Snyk
Help Net Security
Press · 27 Mar 2026, 07:00 · CISA sounds alarm on Langflow RCE, Trivy supply chain compromise after rapid exploitation - Help Net Security
Arctic Wolf
Press · 25 Mar 2026, 07:00 · TeamPCP Supply Chain Attack Campaign Targets Trivy, Checkmarx (KICS), and LiteLLM (Potential Downstream Impact to Additional Projects) - Arctic Wolf
Kaspersky
Press · 25 Mar 2026, 07:00 · Trojanization of Trivy, Checkmarx, and LiteLLM solutions - Kaspersky
The Hacker News
Press · 24 Mar 2026, 07:00 · TeamPCP Hacks Checkmarx GitHub Actions Using Stolen CI Credentials - The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Press · 23 Mar 2026, 07:00 · Trivy Hack Spreads Infostealer via Docker, Triggers Worm and Kubernetes Wiper - The Hacker News

Score evolution

● Hype   ● Reality

Earlier evidence-support scores are retained in history; this chart shows only the current priority definition.

First record: hype 0.0 · reality 8.7 (2026-11-02 15:14). The curve appears once the score changes.

Public exploit evidence

0

Public exploit entries / repo candidates

Evidence context and dated references

Reality is general threat/review priority, combining observed exploitation, CVSS severity and fresh EPSS. Evidence confidence is separate. This is not calibrated risk, a victim count or an asset-specific assessment. A range reflects missing numeric inputs.

Evidence in context

Confidence in exploitation evidence
Exploitation recorded
Priority basis
Recorded exploitation; CVSS 9.4; EPSS 59.7%
Attention, last 30 days
0 distinct story titles; 0 press documents; 0 publisher domains.
Technical potential
network access, low privileges, no user interaction.
Observed activity
Exploitation recorded in CISA KEV.
Known scale
Not quantified.
Evidence confidence basis
Trusted exploitation confirmation

Score evaluated: 2026-11-05 14:00:06.817747+00:00 · EPSS snapshot: 2026-11-05T12:03:04Z

Source event timeline
First press mention
23 Mar 2026, 07:00
Published
23 Mar 2026, 21:47
Added to the CISA KEV catalog
26 Mar 2026, 00:00
Latest press mention
13 Aug 2026, 07:00
Score calculated
05 Nov 2026, 14:00